Vayakhel

February 20, 2014

Vayakhel

Bezalel and Ahaliav
 
This week’s parsha continues with the building of the Mishkan. It describes the work done by Bezalel and his co-workers in constructing the Mishkan and the vessels.
 
34. And He gave the ability to teach, both him (Bezalel) and Oholiab, the son of Ahisamach, of the tribe of Dan.  
 
לד. וּלְהוֹרֹת נָתַן בְּלִבּוֹ הוּא וְאָהֳלִיאָב בֶּן אֲחִיסָמָךְ לְמַטֵּה דָן:
 
Rashi: “and Oholiab of the tribe of Dan, of the lowest of the tribes, of the sons of the handmaidens [Bilhah and Zilpah. Dan was Bilhah’s son]. Yet the Omnipresent compared him [Oholiab] to Bezalel for the work of the Mishkan, and he [Bezalel] was of the greatest of the tribes [Judah], to fulfill what is said: “and a prince was not recognized before a poor man” (Job 34:19). -[from Tanchuma 13]
 
ואהליאב: משבט דן, מן הירודין שבשבטים מבני השפחות, והשוהו המקום לבצלאל למאלכת המשכן, והוא מגדולי השבטים, לקיים מה שנאמר (איוב לד יט) ולא נכר שוע לפני דל:   
 
Rashi’s message is clear. He says that Torah teaches us a moral lesson, i.e., that God does not show preference to the privileged over the less privileged. We derive this from the fact that God chose Ahaliav, the son of one of Jacob’s maidservants, to be on an equal footing with Bezalel, the son of Leah, one of Jacob’s wives, in the holy work of constructing the Tabernacle. And we are made aware of this by the phrasing of our verse.
 
But if you compare our verse with a previous one, you will have a question. See 31:6 (parshat Ki Tisa). There it says:
“I have given with him (Bezalel) Ahaliav the son of Achisamach of the Tribe of Dan, etc.”
 
 There, Rashi did not comment. Why didn’t he make the comment he made on our verse on this earlier verse? This verse also mentions Ahaliav together with Bezalel.
 
In verse 31:6 it says “with him (Bezalel.)” The word “with” can be understood to mean “subordinate to” and not necessarily “equal to.” While in our verse we have the words “him and Ahaliav etc.” Here the two are placed on an equal basis. Thus it is not by chance that Rashi makes his comment here and not earlier; only here does the wording of the verse stress their equality.
 
Rashi always comments at the earliest opportunity in the Torah. If he does not, then we must research into why not.
 
Shabbat shalom
 
Rabbi Wise

3 Responses to “Vayakhel”

  1. max said

    But then the question is: is he really equal if in the other verse he’s sub-ordinate? which is it to be???

  2. Rabbi Wise said

    Read again carefully. It says “with” which can be understood to mean subordinate but not necessarily so.
    We have the same limmud with the Aseret Hadibrot. HaShem said them all together. Then they were repeated. Why?
    Why say them together as a cocophany of sound which could not be understood by humans only to repeat them individually?
    In order to teach that the order is not significant. It’s just that they had to be said in some order.
    So here with Bezalel and Ohaliav. Had the Torah written Ohaliav first you would have thought that he was more important. ( You remember the joke about the are wish mother who gave her son a red and a blue tie?!)
    Therefore the Torah keeps the order but changes the wording from “and” to “with” to teach the limmud that they were indeed equal.
    It is the same lesson as the half shekel. We understand why the poor should give less but why shouldn’t the rich give more? So what if a millionaire wanted to donate the entire Menorah to the Mishkan? It must have been very frustrating for the rich.
    Rather like the prohibition of ploughing with an Ox and an Ass. Most people tend to think that it is to prevent cruelty to the ass who can’t keep up and has to hear the ox chewing yesterdays meal. But look at it differently. Maybe it just as cruel and frustrating to the Ox who wants to plough on ahead (pun intended!)
    You always have to look at these things from both sides.
    Kol tov.

  3. max said

    Fair enough. But can we really say that the order of the 10 commandments isn’t significant? Especially since we’re told the first 2 were direct from G-d as opposed to the others.
    They may be equal in a sense but, as Orwell said, some are more equal than others!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: