Devarim

August 11, 2016

The Talmud and many of the Classical commentators already recognised that the style of the book of Devarim is somewhat different from the first four books. But this did not lead them to think that there was a different author.

Abarbanel raises the issue, centuries before the Bible “critics”, quite sharply. If only Wellhausen had been able to read the commentaries!

Abarbanel explains that the impetus for such a challenge comes from three anomalies in the Book of Devarim.

First of all, if God was the sole author, why would it be necessary to repeat so much material in this Book? If the purpose was to give a further explanation, what would be the purpose of mentioning them earlier if they had to be clarified later on anyhow? This is not how authors normally proceed.

Secondly, the first four Books are written as a third-person narrative, but the Book of Devarim, until the portion of Vayelech, is written as Moshe’s first person narrative. If God was the author, how could Moshe ascribe these words to himself?

Thirdly, if the entire Book was written by God how can we explain the Talmudic passage (Megillah 31): “The curses in the Book of Vayikra were received by Moshe from God and given over in the plural, while the curses in the Book of Devarim were spoken in the singular by Moshe himself.” The clear implication is that these curses were not transmitted to Moshe by God.

Abarbanel answers that the Book of Devarim must be viewed from two perspectives. Firstly, it should be viewed as Moshe’s personal farewell address to the nation. His purpose in repeating some of the mitzvot was not to admonish the nation or to teach them mitzvot that they had not heard at Sinai. On the contrary, they had already received all the mitzvot at Sinai. Some had been explained in detail, while others had been mentioned briefly or only hinted at. Knowing that his death was imminent he took it upon himself to explain those matters that required further clarification. In regard to the historical events that had transpired during the forty years in the wilderness, especially those which had transpired immediately after the Exodus from Egypt, Moshe’s goal was to explain to the new generation that was about to enter the Land what had happened to their fathers so that they would not have any doubts about the imminent entry into the Land of Israel. This answers the first question.

In regard to the second question, even though this was Moshe’s personal address to the nation, its final written form as the Book of Devarim was dictated by God. In essence, God himself was the final Editor. Moshe delivered the speech; that is why it is expressed in the first person. But it was God who determined the exact wording to be recorded for posterity. Furthermore, there are numerous instances of first-person dialogue throughout the other Books of the Torah. In the Book of Exodus, for example, there are numerous instances of Pharaoh and Moshe speaking in the first person. Once again, God determined exactly how that dialogue was to be written down.

This approach answers the third question as well. After having Moshe explain the mitzvot to the nation, God gave him the general commandment to issue blessings and curses to the people. The exact detailed content was left to Moshe. But, as we mentioned above, it was God who dictated to Moshe the final form of these blessings and curses that were written down in the Book of Devarim.

The principle that emerges from all of this is that the entire Book of Devarim is the precise word of God, Who commanded how it was to be written, word for word, like all the other Books of the Torah.

Shabbat shalom

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s